Criticism – A Cold Brew

Creators, in addition to their imagination, even at a minor effort in comparison, have gotten the craft manifested. The passion to such creation lies in the craftsman at sole. Comments and feedback are best considered for diluting a persona, or an identity. But creations that come to existence by an unshaken persona might not rely on these comments. The coldness of criticism might have frozen us hard. But ensure that the within is flowing with fluid, it is the mere skin that is to be hardened. The skin and its afferent trait which potentially replaces the surface of an untouched mass hidden under the skull, is the first to feel the chills. An indirect thickening is both ways, the skin and the mind. Criticism had always been fundamental in shaping advancement, at times in helping one realize value. When creators reside at extremities, the chances of value addition to get concentrated in one direction could be higher. A balanced critic would ensure that the value additive prospectus is encouraged across all directions of the created content while value corrective measures are bounded by an individual’s take. Critics at extremes, on the other hand, could altogether shun the creator’s will of creating fearless works. This path could often be opted by such critics for the probable fact that polarized content clings to it, greater viewership.  Media, with no other option but to afloat its monetary interest, adds on as an intangible ingredient to the mix, while making it nearly impossible to filter out propagandas from actuals. Despite the fact that critics have always been fundamental in catalyzing the process of value realization, an hinderance to addition would inevitably slow down the turning of this circular economy. Sentiment, being one of the most underrated factors in wealth creation and social prosperity is to be preserved with utmost care. Acknowledgment and acceptance of varying sentiments could lay varying dimensioned/coloured bricks together for an aesthetic build of the ecosystem. The warmth on the within, could be an evolved property of a coordinating entity where constant pumps have ensured that temperatures are regulated by a united pulse of rhythm. These rhythmic pumps include creators & critics, the balance that gets achieved by a binary functioning. The purpose of which, appears to be in a chaotic growth rather than in a regulative plateau. Critics and their reviews of on an already showcased content, could as well be of valuable inputs for successive creators. A healthier input that would smoothen the turn of this wheel need not be cold. In a frozen model, the static behaviour could potentially waste time. Evolutionists say otherwise that dynamicity is best learned in a static environment. Analogous to the build of muscle, which is best recovered with broken fibres, significance is shed on thriving in a contradicting environment. Optimistically, the coldness in criticism could indirectly ignite the warmth in creation. Beyond warmth, is harshness really necessary? Or is warmth merely a relative phenomenon? An answer to which appears to lie in the progressing timeline. Conclusively, creators that tend to remain busy in their field of turning the wheel and the critics that are ensured to be free from their biased thoughts of analyzing this wheel, are seen to be sipping on the same neutral cup. A choice that pushes one to either pole, starts from this green belt. Do you plan on creating or criticizing? In any case, the former that moves the wheel, has gotten the latter to direct the steer. Not to forget the curved dimensions and its effortless roll, for the leisure it has provided us with. In this ever-rolling journey, cruise free from breakers that spill over your persona.

Critics with intent & creators with content, have evolved by an interdepending warmth. It is the brew that can afford to be cold, and not our priceless bonds that have surpassed this mould.